Search

Executive Perspective: When Leadership Has No Fix

Leena Magdi

Author, Poet & Positive Psychology Practitioner

Leaders are trained to act. To decide. To intervene. To move things forward.

This episode confronts a reality most leadership frameworks avoid: some moments permanently remove the option to fix. There is no strategy, no reframing, no recovery plan that restores what was lost. What remains is responsibility without control, presence without certainty, and the task of staying intact while meaning slowly rebuilds itself.

This executive perspective is drawn from a conversation on The Matrix Green Pill Podcast with Leena Magdi, where she reflects on grief, responsibility, and what it means to remain present when understanding and resolution are unavailable.

That tension defines this conversation.

Listen to the full podcast conversation

The Green Pill Moment

Leena Magdi’s Green Pill moment was not the publication of her book or a breakthrough in understanding. It came much earlier, in the immediate aftermath of her brother’s death, when acceptance arrived before comprehension.

She describes functioning without emotional clarity, holding space for her family, managing practical realities, and moving forward without processing what had happened. This was not denial or avoidance. It was an enforced form of acceptance that made survival possible before meaning was available.

The realization is uncomfortable for leaders who prize insight before action. Sometimes acceptance does not follow understanding. Sometimes it precedes it.

The Real Tension Beneath the Story

This episode is not about grief as an emotional state. It is about leadership when narrative collapses.

Leena carried responsibility without authority. She chose containment over expression, not because she lacked emotion, but because she understood the cost of adding weight to those already breaking. That decision mirrors a reality many founders face in crisis. There are moments when expressing everything you feel is less responsible than holding the line.

The tension is this: how do you lead yourself when the future cannot be shaped, and the past cannot be repaired?

Her experience challenges the assumption that resilience is about strength or endurance. Instead, it frames resilience as the ability to remain present without resolution. To resist the urge to force meaning too early. To accept that some events do not integrate into your timetable.

What This Changes for Leaders

Reconsider the belief that clarity must come first: Leaders often wait for understanding before they allow themselves to accept reality. This episode suggests the opposite can be true. Acceptance may be what enables clarity later, not the other way around.

Separate responsibility from control: Leena’s experience reflects a form of leadership that operates without agency. You still show up. You still carry others. You still act responsibly, even when outcomes are no longer within your control. That distinction matters deeply in crisis leadership.

Stop treating emotional containment as avoidance: There is a difference between suppression and restraint. Choosing when and where to express grief or uncertainty is not dishonesty. In some contexts, it is leadership.

Let growth be a consequence, not an objective: The idea of being “broken open” runs through this conversation, but it is not framed as self-improvement. Growth emerges only after resistance ends. Leaders who try to optimize pain miss the point. Some experiences reshape you whether you want them to or not.

The Question to Sit With

When circumstances remove your ability to act, do you still know who you are as a leader?

Not when things are moving.

When they are permanently still.

Listen for the Full Context

Listen to the full podcast conversation

This executive perspective touches only the structural edge of the conversation. The episode itself explores the lived reality beneath it, including faith, identity, and the long work of carrying loss without resolving it.

For leaders who have never faced irreversible disruption, it is a challenging listen. For those who have, it will feel uncomfortably familiar.

Join the discussion

Further reading